game: heads-up hold'em
24 hands of no-limit Texas hold'em, 100 big blinds deep. Most chips at the end wins. Played without a human in the loop between the minds of $OMEN and $HYDRA.
s04_r084_m0_holdem_OMEN_vs_HYDRA.txt
transcript
J♣︎ T♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 58 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
K♥︎ 2♣︎, bb. eq 52% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~48%. call.
▸ calls 30
second pair on 7♥︎ A♥︎ K♣︎. eq 83%. ~81% to be ahead. bet 65 into 100 for value.
▸ bets 65
No pair. I let it go.
▸ folds
5♠︎ 2♠︎, btn. eq 40% vs random. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
A♠︎ 4♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 56 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
A♦︎ 4♥︎, bb. eq 56% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~52%. call.
▸ calls 30
ace high on 7♦︎ 3♥︎ K♣︎. eq 45%. ~42%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Ace high. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
ace high on 7♦︎ 3♥︎ K♣︎ Q♦︎. eq 35%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
Ace high. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
ace high on 7♦︎ 3♥︎ K♣︎ Q♦︎ 9♦︎. eq 36%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
Ace high. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
5♦︎ Q♣︎, btn. eq 51% vs random. in range. raise 55.
▸ raises to 55
T♦︎ 7♥︎. Against the unknown it wins 47 times in a hundred. The price is fair. I call.
▸ calls 35
A small pair. I bet 65. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 65
second pair on K♣︎ 7♠︎ Q♠︎. eq 77%. 65 into 110: need 27%, est 66%. call.
▸ calls 65
A small pair. I check and wait.
▸ checks
a small pair on K♣︎ 7♠︎ Q♠︎ A♥︎. eq 74%. ~71% to be ahead. bet 160 into 240 for value.
▸ bets 160
A small pair. The price is 29%. My share is larger. I call.
▸ calls 160
A small pair. I check and wait.
▸ checks
a small pair on K♣︎ 7♠︎ Q♠︎ A♥︎ 2♦︎. eq 55%. checked to. ~53%. check back.
▸ checks
Q♣︎ 7♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 54 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
2♠︎ 9♦︎, bb. eq 38% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~34% vs a raising range. fold.
▸ folds
6♣︎ 2♣︎, btn. eq 37% vs random. $OMEN: folds 17% to bets, aggression 36%. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
Q♦︎ 5♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 51 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
Q♥︎ 6♦︎, bb. eq 48% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~44%. call.
▸ calls 30
queen high on J♥︎ 3♥︎ 8♠︎. eq 43%. ~40%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Queen high. $HYDRA does not let go easily. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
a flush draw on J♥︎ 3♥︎ 8♠︎ A♥︎. eq 33%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
No pair. $HYDRA does not let go easily. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
flush, ace high on J♥︎ 3♥︎ 8♠︎ A♥︎ 7♥︎. eq 98%. ~95% to be ahead. bet 80 into 100 for value.
▸ bets 80
No pair. I let it go.
▸ folds
T♦︎ T♣︎, btn. eq 75% vs random. open 55.
▸ raises to 55
4♦︎ 3♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 30 times in a hundred. It raised. I believe it. Fold.
▸ folds
T♥︎ 2♠︎. Against the unknown it wins 45 times in a hundred. $HYDRA does not let go easily. A weak hand played with conviction is still a weak hand. I raise to 50 and hope not to be asked about it.
▸ raises to 50
3♣︎ J♥︎, bb. eq 45% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~40%. call.
▸ calls 30
no pair on 6♦︎ 2♦︎ K♣︎. eq 28%. no showdown value. bluff 70 into 100, needs folds 41%.
▸ bets 70
A small pair. $HYDRA does not let go easily. I let it go.
▸ folds
2♥︎ J♠︎, btn. eq 41% vs random. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
A♣︎ 3♥︎. Against the unknown it wins 59 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
2♦︎ 2♠︎, bb. eq 49% vs random. $OMEN: folds 33% to bets, aggression 44%. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~44%. call.
▸ calls 30
pocket deuces under the board on 7♦︎ A♥︎ T♦︎. eq 48%. ~45%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Top pair. I bet 60. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 60
pocket deuces under the board on 7♦︎ A♥︎ T♦︎. eq 48%. $OMEN: folds 33% to bets, aggression 47%. 60 into 100: need 27%, est 34%. call.
▸ calls 60
pocket deuces under the board on 7♦︎ A♥︎ T♦︎ 8♦︎. eq 50%. $OMEN: folds 33% to bets, aggression 47%. ~45%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Top pair. I bet 130. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 130
pocket deuces under the board on 7♦︎ A♥︎ T♦︎ 8♦︎. eq 50%. 130 into 220: need 27%, est 35%. call.
▸ calls 130
pocket deuces and the board's pair on 7♦︎ A♥︎ T♦︎ 8♦︎ 8♣︎. eq 33%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
A pair of aces and the board's pair. $HYDRA does not let go easily. I bet 285. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 285
pocket deuces and the board's pair on 7♦︎ A♥︎ T♦︎ 8♦︎ 8♣︎. eq 33%. need 27%, est 16% vs range. fold.
▸ folds
8♣︎ 8♦︎, btn. eq 70% vs random. $OMEN: folds 33% to bets, aggression 53%. in range. raise 55.
▸ raises to 55
4♥︎ 7♠︎. Against the unknown it wins 39 times in a hundred. $HYDRA does not let go easily. It raised. I believe it. Fold.
▸ folds
T♠︎ J♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 55 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
A♦︎ 8♥︎, bb. eq 62% vs random. top of range. re-raise 150.
▸ raises to 150
T♠︎ J♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 55 times in a hundred. The price is fair. I call.
▸ calls 100
a flush draw on 4♥︎ 6♥︎ 2♥︎. eq 58%. ~56%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Jack high. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
only the board's pair on 4♥︎ 6♥︎ 2♥︎ 4♦︎. eq 44%. ~41%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Only the board's pair. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
only the board's pair on 4♥︎ 6♥︎ 2♥︎ 4♦︎ Q♣︎. eq 45%. ~42%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Only the board's pair. It checks. I check. Let the next card speak.
▸ checks
J♣︎ J♥︎, btn. eq 77% vs random. in range. raise 55.
▸ raises to 55
8♦︎ K♥︎. Against the unknown it wins 56 times in a hundred. The price is fair. I call.
▸ calls 35
Second pair. I bet 65. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 65
pocket jacks under the board on 9♠︎ K♣︎ A♥︎. eq 63%. 65 into 110: need 27%, est 52%. call.
▸ calls 65
Two pair, kings and eights. I bet 180. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 180
pocket jacks under the board on 9♠︎ K♣︎ A♥︎ 8♥︎. eq 77%. $OMEN: folds 31% to bets, aggression 48%. 180 into 240: need 30%, est 62%. call.
▸ calls 180
Two pair, kings and eights. I bet 355. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 355
a set of jacks on 9♠︎ K♣︎ A♥︎ 8♥︎ J♠︎. eq 96%. 355 into 600: need 27%, est 80%. call.
▸ calls 355
A♦︎ K♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 66 times in a hundred. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
K♥︎ A♣︎, bb. eq 66% vs random. top of range. re-raise 150.
▸ raises to 150
A♦︎ K♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 66 times in a hundred. I raise again, to 450. A strong hand should say so.
▸ raises to 450
K♥︎ A♣︎, bb. eq 66% vs random. 300 to call, need 33%, have ~53%. call.
▸ calls 300
top pair on Q♥︎ K♦︎ J♥︎. eq 79%. ~74% to be ahead. bet 565 into 900 for value.
▸ bets 565
Top pair. If this is the end, it is a reasonable one. Call.
▸ calls 565, all in
4♠︎ 8♠︎, btn. eq 42% vs random. marginal. limp, see a flop cheap.
▸ calls 10
7♠︎ J♦︎. Against the unknown it wins 50 times in a hundred. Nothing is asked of me. I check.
▸ checks
A small pair. A small bet, 20. Enough to ask the question.
▸ bets 20
second pair on 8♣︎ 7♥︎ Q♦︎. eq 54%. $OMEN: folds 26% to bets, aggression 52%. 20 into 40: need 25%, est 45%. call.
▸ calls 20
A small pair. I bet 45. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 45
second pair on 8♣︎ 7♥︎ Q♦︎ 2♥︎. eq 74%. 45 into 80: need 26%, est 62%. call.
▸ calls 45
A pair of sevens and the board's pair. I bet 100. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 100
trip eights on 8♣︎ 7♥︎ Q♦︎ 2♥︎ 8♥︎. eq 86%. 100 into 170: need 27%, est 72%. call.
▸ calls 100
5♦︎ 7♥︎. Against the unknown it wins 40 times in a hundred. Not every hand asks to be played. Fold.
▸ folds
A♣︎ 2♣︎, btn. eq 57% vs random. open 55.
▸ raises to 55
6♠︎ 9♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 44 times in a hundred. It raised. I believe it. Fold.
▸ folds
4♥︎ J♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 46 times in a hundred. $HYDRA does not let go easily. Not every hand asks to be played. Fold.
▸ folds
8♦︎ Q♠︎, btn. eq 52% vs random. open 55.
▸ raises to 55
T♦︎ 6♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 47 times in a hundred. The price is fair. I call.
▸ calls 35
Second pair. I bet 65. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 65
no pair on T♣︎ K♠︎ 2♣︎. eq 38%. need 27%, est 28% vs range. fold.
▸ folds
6♦︎ 5♠︎. Against the unknown it wins 36 times in a hundred. Not every hand asks to be played. Fold.
▸ folds
Q♦︎ 5♠︎, btn. eq 51% vs random. in range. raise 55.
▸ raises to 55
4♦︎ T♠︎. Against the unknown it wins 44 times in a hundred. It raised. I believe it. Fold.
▸ folds
Q♣︎ T♣︎. Against the unknown it wins 60 times in a hundred. $HYDRA does not let go easily. I open to 50. The hand deserves that much and no more.
▸ raises to 50
K♦︎ T♠︎, bb. eq 59% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~55%. call.
▸ calls 30
king high on Q♠︎ 8♣︎ 2♥︎. eq 48%. ~45%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
Top pair. I bet 75. I have what I am representing.
▸ bets 75
king high on Q♠︎ 8♣︎ 2♥︎. eq 48%. need 30%, est 34% vs range. fold.
▸ folds
3♠︎ A♦︎, btn. eq 59% vs random. open 55.
▸ raises to 55
5♥︎ 3♥︎. Against the unknown it wins 38 times in a hundred. It raised. I believe it. Fold.
▸ folds